A mysterious phone call from a BC government lawyer to the BCTF invited the BCTF to discuss "remedies" for not having what is called "manner and consequence" language bargained under the changes to the School Act that were imposed in 2002. At that time, despite a judicial order, ALL language on class size and composition was removed - including language that does not impose "limits", but rather the "manner" in which a class is created and the "consequences" of creating such a class. For example, language that provided TOC time to teachers with more than 2 students with an IEP was removed. This is "consequence" language.
It seems the government is finally realizing they went way beyond the pale when they chose to simply legislate the removal of all our class size and composition language and they are now worried about what the Supreme Court will say.
This is good news for teachers AND students and provides a glimmer of hope as we prepare to enter the next round of bargaining.
Testing the comment feature. This "consequence" review is good to hear about. Significant "consequences" for teachers and students have been apparent to anyone who actually spends any time in a classroom, as opposed to Minstry "idea of the week" meetings.
ReplyDelete